Showing posts with label president. Show all posts
Showing posts with label president. Show all posts

Saturday, March 3, 2012

President Obama cracks jokes at elite Alfalfa Club dinner

Well, look who decided to come around! President Obama, whose White House years have been marked by a careful avoidance of so many black-tie Beltway traditions, attended the most elite of them all, the annual Alfalfa Club dinner, on Saturday.

Why? In his remarks at the Capital Hilton, to political and business heavyhitters who’d walked a gantlet of Occupy D.C. protesters to make it to their steak-and-lobster meal, the president explained:

“You’ve heard it from the pundits: ‘Obama is cloistered in the White House.’ ‘He’s aloof.’ ‘He’s in the bubble.’ ‘He’s not connecting.’ And that’s why one of my big goals this year was to get out and be among everyday, ordinary Americans — like the men and women of the Alfalfa Club.”

Ha ha! How everyday-ordinary were they? “I’d like to acknowledge a very good friend of mine,” he added, according to excerpts of his speech released by the White House. “Warren Buffett’s secretary’s boss is in the house.

Yes, it’s one of those jocular affairs. Obama also joked that he had “about 45 more minutes on the State of the Union that I’d like to deliver tonight,” and mused about his own “promising future — as an Al Green impersonator.”

It was the first time since 2009 that the president had attended the officially-off-the-record (but traditionally leaky) A-list conclave. But maybe he’s starting to like this stuff more? Last spring he attended his first Gridiron Dinner — a white-tie, elite media gala — since becoming president.

He was accompanied by the first lady, wearing something long, flowing and possibly red, according to a dispatch from a White House pool reporter who couldn’t get a good look in the dark.

Among the other VIPs reported to be in attendance: John Boehner, Mike Bloomberg, John Kerry, Pat Leahy, Steny Hoyer, Mark Warner, Steve Case, Cal Ripken and José Andrés.


Occupy DC demonstrators throw glitter on guests arriving at the Alfalfa Club dinner. (Jose Luis Magana/AP) Also: Joe Lieberman, who drew catcalls from the Occupy demonstrators who recognized him on his way in. Other tuxedoed guests were showered with glitter by the activists.

And Jeb and George H.W. Bush, frequent Alfalfa attendees, who spent time visiting with Obama on Friday afternoon.

A hallmark of the annual dinner is the club’s jokey “nomination” of a VIP guest as its candidate for president — this year, the former Florida governor.

“It is great to see Jeb Bush, who is accepting a nomination for President tonight,” Obama said. “I have to say, though, it’s not fair to tease your friends like that.”

What is the Alfalfa Club anyway? A power-broker’s fraternity (and sorority, now, since it admitted women in 1994) that now exists solely for the purpose of hosting this dinner. Always held on the last Saturday in January, it was founded in 1913 to honor the birthday of, er, Robert E. Lee. That fact gave Obama a decent zinger the last time he addressed the club in 2009. “If he were with us tonight, the general would be 202 years old,” the president joked, just days after his own historic inauguration. “And very confused.”

Updated. An earlier version of this story was published at 12 a.m.

Read also: Occupy D.C. contemplates McPherson decampment, protest Alfalfa Club dinner, 1/28/12

Read earlier: Alfalfa Club 2011; Bushes but no Obama to annual dinner, as POTUS skips black-tie affair for Axelrod farewell, 1/30/11

Alfalfa Club 2010; politicians joke at dinner; some oldies, some goodies, 2/1/10

Alfalfa Club 2009; Elite officially welcome Obama, 2/1/09

Obama gets laughs at first Gridiron Club dinner as president, 3/31/11


View the original article here

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Would Mitt Romney be the richest president ever?

???initialComments:true! pubdate:! commentPeriod:14! commentEndDate:! currentDate:! allowComments:true! displayComments:true!

Mitt Romney is rich; this much we know.

But would he be the richest president ever?

In terms of raw dollars, yes. If you adjust for inflation, though, the answer is no.

In fact, the wealthiest president appears to have been one of the nation’s most beloved Commanders in Chief and the nation’s first president, George Washington.

Multiple studies have estimated Washington’s net worth, in today’s dollars, at more than $500 million, due in large part to his Virginia plantation at Mount Vernon being so vast and so fertile.

A 1996 book by two economists also ranked Washington among the wealthiest 100 Americans of all-time, noting that his net worth, which stood at about half a million dollars at the time of his death in 1799, would be worth about half a billion dollars today. Washington is the only president who made the “Wealthy 100” list.

Romney, whose net worth is estimated at between $190 and $250 million, just can’t compete with that. So where does he rank?

Probably either second or third, depending on whether his actual net worth is closer to $190 million or $250 million.

Thomas Jefferson, the nation’s third president, was worth an estimated $212 million, according to a study by the Web site 24/7 Wall St., so he and Romney are pretty close.

(Interesting fact: John F. Kennedy stood to inherit his father’s $1 billion fortune, but he didn’t live long enough.)

So while Romney wouldn’t be the wealthiest president, he would be the wealthiest president in more than 200 years. In fact, presidents over the course of history have gotten progressively poorer. The 24/7 Wall St. study shows each of the first eight presidents were worth at least $19 million, adjusted for inflation. Relatively speaking, Barack Obama is struggling to get by with a net worth of between $2.8 million and $11.8 million.

So, back to Romney. Given that Washington was not nominated by a party, the question is whether Romney would be the wealthiest major party presidential nominee.

The answer: probably not.

Romney is definitely not the wealthiest presidential candidate of all time. That distinction appears to belong to billionaire Ross Perot, who ran as a third-party candidate in both 1992 and 1996. Businessman Steve Forbes, who ran in the 2000 GOP primary, also has Romney beat, with a net worth of $450 million, according to a study by Wealth X.

As for major-party nominees, Romney also probably comes in behind 2004 Democratic nominee Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), whose net worth in his 2004 personal financial disclosure report was estimated at between $237 million and $312 million. (And Kerry’s wife, Theresa Heinz Kerry, is worth much more than that — as much as $1 billion.)

So unless Romney is at the very top of his estimated range and Kerry was at the very bottom of his, Kerry was wealthier at the time that he ran for president. And if you include Kerry’s wife, it’s not even close.

Scott Wilson; David Nakamura 

Krissah Thompson 

Associated Press 

Amy Gardner 

Amy Gardner; Rosalind S. Helderman 

Associated Press 

::unspecified:: 

Peter Wallsten 

Dan Balz 

David A. Fahrenthold; Paul Kane 


View the original article here

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

President Obama cracks jokes at elite Alfalfa Club dinner (updated)


Barack Obama got to hear some good jokes from Sandra Day O’Connor(left) at the Alfalfa Club dinner, but left before Jeb Bush (right) did his routine. (All three shown in Washington Post file photos from last year; press photographers were not allowed at the dinner.)

UPDATED 7 p.m.

Well, look who decided to come around! President Obama, whose White House years have been marked by a careful avoidance of so many black-tie Beltway traditions, attended the most elite of them all Saturday night.

Why the Alfalfa Club dinner? In his remarks to political and business heavy hitters — many of whom had walked to their steak-and-lobster meal at the Capital Hilton along a gantlet of Occupy D.C. protesters outside — the president explained:

“You’ve heard it from the pundits: ‘Obama is cloistered in the White House.’ ‘He’s aloof.’ ‘He’s in the bubble.’ ‘He’s not connecting.’ . . . One of my big goals this year was to get out and be among everyday, ordinary Americans — like the men and women of the Alfalfa Club.”

Ha ha! How everyday and ordinary were they? “I’d like to acknowledge a very good friend of mine,” he added, according to excerpts released by the White House. “Warren Buffett’s secretary’s boss is in the house.”

Also: John Boehner, Michael Bloomberg, John Kerry, John McCain, David Rubenstein, Pat Leahy, Steny Hoyer, Madeleine Albright, Steve Case, Cal Ripken, Valerie Jarrett, and Jose Andres, to name a few. And, randomly, Sally Field, a guest of student-loan titan Catherine Reynolds. Both Joe Lieberman and Mark Warner were there with glitter in their hair, having been glitter-bombed by the demonstrators.


Occupy DC demonstrators throw glitter on guests arriving at the Alfalfa Club dinner. (Jose Luis Magana/AP)

It was the first time since 2009 that the president had attended the closed-door, off-the-record conclave — and the first time in history that Alfalfa had hosted three presidents, with the return of George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, a regular who seems to love these dinners as much as Obama hates them.

Maybe Obama’s starting to warm to this stuff? Last spring he attended his first Gridiron Club Dinner since becoming president — a similar kind of thing, but with white tie and elite media.

Or.?.?. maybe not. The president usually speaks last at Alfalfa, but the White House got him booked in the middle of Saturday’s dinner. (He also joked that he had “about 45 more minutes on the State of the Union that I’d like to deliver tonight,” and mused about his own “promising future — as an Al Green impersonator.”) After his speech, he and Michelle Obama (in a flowing, violet dress) got the heck out of there, which left some guests grumbling and some speakers scrambling to jettison jokes that needed POTUS in the room to work.

Oh well. At least he got to hear one of the best-received jokes of the night, from outgoing club president Sandra Day O’Connor.

It’s ironic, the retired Supreme Court justice quipped: Mitt is the Mormon — but Newt is the polygamist. (Paraphrasing here, via guests who leaked the night’s best gags.)

But he missed the surprise star turn by the night’s honoree, Jeb Bush. A hallmark of the annual dinner is the club’s jokey “nomination” of a VIP guest as its candidate for president — this year, the former Florida governor, whose easy and witty speech had some Republicans in the room misty-eyed about the one who got away.

With two presidents in the family, he said, you got to deal with a lot of bossiness. “If I say, ‘Who put you in charge?’, Dad says, ‘The American people.’ And George says, ‘The Supreme Court, five to four.’?”

Musing about the 2012 GOP hopefuls, Jeb went on, “The field was so muddled, at one point my brother was thinking about running again. ‘George,’ I said, ‘The Constitution prohibits you from running again.’ He said, ‘Wow, they put my name in the Constitution?’?”

What is the Alfalfa Club, anyway? A power broker’s fraternity (and sorority, since it admitted women in 1994) that now exists solely to host this dinner, always held on the last Saturday in January. It was founded in 1913 to honor the birthday of, er, Robert E. Lee. That fact gave Obama a decent zinger when he addressed the club in 2009, just days after his own historic inauguration. “If he were with us tonight, the general would be 202 years old,” the president joked. “And very confused.”

Updated. Earlier versions of this story were published at 12 a.m. and 5:30 a.m.

Read also: Occupy D.C. contemplates McPherson decampment, protest Alfalfa Club dinner, 1/28/12

Read earlier: Alfalfa Club 2011; Bushes but no Obama to annual dinner, as POTUS skips black-tie affair for Axelrod farewell, 1/30/11

Alfalfa Club 2010; politicians joke at dinner; some oldies, some goodies, 2/1/10

Alfalfa Club 2009; Elite officially welcome Obama, 2/1/09

Obama gets laughs at first Gridiron Club dinner as president, 3/31/11


View the original article here

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Obama as most polarizing president: A rebuttal

???initialComments:true! pubdate:01/30/2012 15:29 EST! commentPeriod:14! commentEndDate:2/13/12 3:29 EST! currentDate:1/30/12 6:0 EST! allowComments:true! displayComments:true!Posted by Chris Cillizza at 03:29 PM ET, 01/30/2012

Our post on Gallup’s finding that the first three years of President Obama’s time of office were the most politically polarizing — in terms of the gap between how Democrats and Republican viewed him — of any first three years of a president’s tenure has drawn lots (and lots) of comments.

Fix friend Jim Manley, a longtime aide to Democratic Sens. Ted Kennedy (Mass.) and Harry Reid (Nev.), was particularly exercised about the post. We offered him the chance to respond — and he did. Manley’s comments are unedited. (We added a few hyperlinks to allow Fix readers to see some of the articles to which he is pointing.)

Writes Jim:

I have been a long time fan of The Fix and his expanding empire of reporters, so imagine my surprise this am when I checked my blackberry and this is what I saw, “Obama: The most polarizing president. Ever.” Now, as someone who spent the first two years of the Obama administration working as a senior Senate democratic leadership aide for Senator Reid, I needless to say have slightly different perspective on things.

For me, this quote from Senator Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) that appeared in National Journal magazine on Oct. 23, 2010 neatly sums up what I saw every day in the Senate and in every decision Republicans made: “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”

Or this headline, which came out of speech that Senator McConnell gave at the Heritage Foundation two days after the 2010 election: “GOP leader’s top goal: Make Obama one –term president.”

So, for The Fix to write in kind of a throwaway line “that Democrats will point out that Republicans in Congress have played a significant role in the polarization” falls far short of the mark and made me kind of mad.

I guess the larger point that I am trying to make is that President Obama should not be blamed for the sharply polarized tone of the current political process because Republicans have made such an aggressive shift to the right. Or, put slightly differently, the President CAN be blamed for his unwillingness to go further to right than the American people are comfortable with — and for that he has been demonized and vilified by the right.

As John Harris and John Allen mentioned in Politico today, quoting Professor Keith Poole: “The Republican Party has been steadily moving to the right since the 1970s. The Republicans have moved about three times the speed to the right as the Democrats have moved to the left.”

And this from Ryan Lizza in the New Yorker: “The Republican Party has drifted much farther to the right than the Democratic Party has drifted to the left. Jacob Hacker, a professor at Yale, whose 2006 book, ‘Off Center,’ documented this trend, told me, citing Poole and Rosenthal’s data on congressional voting records, that, since 1975, ‘Senate Republicans moved roughly twice as far to the right as Senate Democrats moved to the left’ and ‘House Republicans moved roughly six times as far to the right as House Democrats moved to the left.’” In other words, the story of the past few decades is asymmetric polarization.

Two well-known Washington political analysts, Thomas Mann, of the bipartisan Brookings Institution, and Norman Ornstein, of the conservative American Enterprise Institute, agree.

In a forthcoming book about Washington dysfunction, “It’s Even Worse Than It Looks,” they write: “One of our two major parties, the Republicans, has become an insurgent outlier—ideologically extreme, contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime, scornful of compromise, unpersuaded by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science, and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.”

Karen Tumulty; Philip Rucker 

Dan Balz 

Nia-malika Henderson 

Carol D. Leonnig 

Jerry Markon; Alice Crites 

::unspecified:: 

Amy Gardner; Philip Rucker; William Branigin 

Rachel Weiner 

Ed O'keefe; Eric Yoder 

Karen Tumulty 

::unspecified:: 

Aaron Blake 

Felicia Sonmez 

Lori Stahl 

Associated Press 

Philip Rucker; Amy Gardner 

Chris Cillizza 


View the original article here

Monday, January 30, 2012

Obama: The most polarizing president. Ever.

President Obama ran — and won — in 2008 on the idea of uniting the country. But, each of his first three years in office have marked historic highs in political polarization, with Democrats largely approving of him and Republicans deeply disapproving.


President Obama waits to speak at the Democratic Issues Conference at Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay in Cambridge, Md., on Friday. (AFP Photo/Jewel Samad)For 2011, Obama’s third year in office, an average of 80 percent of Democrats approved of the job he was doing in Gallup tracking polls, as compared to 12 percent of Republicans who felt the same way. That’s a 68-point partisan gap, the highest for any president’s third year in office — ever. (The previous high was George W. Bush in 2007, when he had a 59 percent difference in job approval ratings.)

In 2010, the partisan gap between how Obama was viewed by Democrats versus Republicans stood at 68 percent; in 2009, it was 65 percent. Both were the highest marks ever for a president’s second and first years in office, respectively.

What do those numbers tell us? Put simply: that the country is hardening along more and more strict partisan lines.

While it’s easy to look at the numbers cited above and conclude that Obama has failed at his mission of bringing the country together, a deeper dig into the numbers in the Gallup poll suggests that the idea of erasing the partisan gap is simply impossible, as political polarization is rising rapidly.

Out of the ten most partisan years in terms of presidential job approval in Gallup data, seven — yes, seven — have come since 2004. Bush had a run between 2004 and 2007 in which the partisan disparity of his job approval was at 70 points or higher.

“Obama’s ratings have been consistently among the most polarized for a president in the last 60 years,” concludes Gallup’s Jeffrey Jones in a memo summing up the results. “That may not be a reflection on Obama himself as much as on the current political environment in the United States, because Obama’s immediate predecessor, Bush, had similarly polarized ratings, particularly in the latter stages of his presidency after the rally in support from the 9/11 terror attacks faded.”

Our guess is that Jones’ latter hypothesis is the right one — that we are simply living in an era in which Democrats dislike a Republican president (and Republicans dislike a Democratic one) even before the commander in chief has taken a single official action.

The realization of that hyper-partisan reality has been slow in coming for Obama. But in recent months, he seems to have turned a rhetorical corner — taking the fight to Republicans (and Republicans in Congress, particularly) and all but daring them to call his bluff.

Democrats will point at that Republicans in Congress have played a significant part in the polarization; the congressional GOP has stood resolutely against almost all of Obama’s top priorities. And Obama’s still-high popularity among the Democratic base also exacerbates the gap.

For believers in bipartisanship, the next nine months are going to be tough sledding, as the already-gaping partisan divide between the two parties will only grow as the 2012 election draws nearer. And, if the last decade of Gallup numbers are any indication, there’s little turnaround in sight.

Romney says Gingrich has hurt himself: Trying a new tack in Florida, Mitt Romney said Newt Gingrich’s fall in the polls is his own fault.

“The people of Florida have watched the debates and listened to the speaker and listened to the other candidates and said, ‘You know what? Mitt Romney is the guy we’re going to support,’” Romney said at a rally in Naples.

“I think each of us, if we fail somewhere, if we fail in a debate, if we fail to get the support of people, it’s time to look in the mirror,” Romney said.

Gingrich has complained over the last week about an applause ban at a debate, has accused Romney of lying about his record, and has lashed out at the GOP “establishment,” which he says is out to get him.

NBC asks Romney to pull Brokaw ad: A new Romney ad in Florida uses extensive footage of former NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Brokaw reporting on Gingrich’s 1997 ethics reprimand, and Brokaw and NBC aren’t happy about it.

“I am extremely uncomfortable with the extended use of my personal image in this political ad,” Brokaw said in a statement. “I do not want my role as a journalist compromised for political gain by any campaign.”

The report describes Gingrich’s reprimand by the U.S. House in 1997 for using tax-exempt money for political purposes and giving the House Ethics Committee false information.

Kerrey buying property in Nebraska: Former senator Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.) tells The Fix that he is buying property in his former home state of Nebraska, but that it doesn’t mean he will seek a return to the Senate in the Cornhusker State.

Kerrey left Nebraska after retiring from the Senate and at one point flirted with the idea of running for mayor of his new home, New York City, where he headed up the New School university.. That’s something Republicans are likely to use against him if he opts to run for retiring Sen. Ben Nelson’s (D-Neb.) seat.

But if he does run, Kerrey will have a Nebraska address from which to do it. A senator must live in the state he or she represents.

In response to The Fix’s inquiry, Kerrey confirmed he was buying a place in Nebraska: “Yes, but it really isn’t a signal that we have decided to re- enter politics.”

“Almost all my family is in Nebraska so we need a place to gather when I am back,” he added.

Kerrey is considered the Democrats’ best hope of holding what is arguably their toughest Senate seat to defend.

Gingrich broaches brokered convention: Despite his troubles in Florida, Gingrich says the GOP presidential contest will continue for months and that Romney may not get enough delegates to win outright at the convention.

“When you add the two conservatives together we clearly beat Romney,” Gingrich said, according to the Wall Street Journal. “I think Romney’s got a very real challenge trying to get a majority at the convention.”

As our great delegate tracker shows, a candidate needs more than half of the 2,286 available delegates to win the nomination. If no candidate gets that number, the GOP would go to its convention later this year without a defined nominee.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) has already aimed to stay in the race for the long haul and build up delegates, but a third candidate would likely need to stay in the race and amass delegates to prevent Romney from getting a majority.

We’ve written before about how this is unlikely.

Santorum leaves trail with daughter hospitalized: Rick Santorum left the campaign trail after his his 3-year-old daughter, Bella, was hospitalized this weekend with pneumonia.

Santorum skipped an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press and campaign events Sunday to tend to Bella, who has a rare genetic disorder and has undergone frequent treatment and multiple surgeries.

In Santorum’s stead, his 20-year-old daughter Elizabeth and the Duggar family, from TLC’s “19 Kids and Counting,” have been traveling around Florida, and Santorum held two teleconferenced events Sunday evening.

Late Sunday, Santorum said Bella had experienced a “miraculous turnaround,” and that he will return to the campaign trail as long as her progress continues. He did not say whether he would return to Florida, where he has struggled to compete with Romney and Gingrich.

Fixbits:

A new NBC/Marist College poll confirms Romney has taken a big lead in Florida — 15 points, to be specific. And a Miami Herald/El Nuevo Herald/Tampa Bay Times poll confirms the double-digit lead.

Some market analysts say Romney losing the primary would hurt the stock market.

Donald Trump update: He’s still threatening to run.

A little more than a week after endorsing the American people, Herman Cain switches his endorsement to Gingrich. So is he still supporting the American people?

Paul focuses on Maine, whose caucuses will be held in early February.

Former congressman Pete Hoekstra leads the Michigan GOP Senate primary 40 percent to 3 percent over businessman Clark Durant, according to a new EPIC/MRA poll. The winner gets Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.).

Rep. William Keating (D-Mass.) could face trouble in his redrawn congressional district, including a potential rematch of his close 2010 primary.

Must-reads:

“Gingrich Invoking Reagan, Implausibly” — Albert R. Hunt, Bloomberg

“Some balking at Gingrich’s insider-outsider claims” — Charles Babington, AP

“Rabbi’s Followers Cast Doubts on Congressman’s Fund-Raising” — Alison Leigh Cowan and William K. Rashbaum, New York Times

“Super PAC takeover? Not so fast, campaigns say” — Kenneth P. Vogel and Dave Levinthal, Politico

“Consensus of Polls Shows Romney Up in Florida” — Nate Silver, New York Times


View the original article here

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Stephen Colbert hands super PAC to Jon Stewart, will run for president... of South Carolina

Stephen Colbert is exploring a run for president of the United States ... of South Carolina.

The comedian and Charleston native announced on his show Thursday night that he is forming an exploratory committee and is handing over control of his super PAC to fellow “Comedy Central” host Jon Stewart.

The name of the new organization?

“The Definitely Not Coordinating with Stephen Colbert Super PAC.”

Colbert’s move comes days after a poll by Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling, which conducts automated surveys, showed him taking five percent support in South Carolina That’s one percentage point higher than that for former Utah governor Jon Huntsman (R), whose name, unlike Colbert’s, will be among those appearing on the state’s Jan. 21 GOP primary ballot.

It also comes weeks after Colbert made an unsuccessful attempt through his super PAC to fund the South Carolina Republican primary. He had offered $400,000 in exchange for a deal that would have renamed the contest “The Colbert Super PAC South Carolina Republican Primary,” a proposal that state GOP officials ultimately rejected.

Colbert’s his super PAC was approved by the Federal Election Commission in June. But the comedy host missed the deadline for qualifying for the ballot, and South Carolina election rules do not allow write-in votes in party primaries or in the presidential and vice presidential races.

As Colbert announced to viewers Thursday night:

“For over a day now, the people of South Carolina have been crying out for someone who can restore our nation’s former greatness to its current perfection. Well, America, that someone is now. I am proud to announce that I am forming an exploratory committee to lay the groundwork for my possible candidacy for the president of the United States of South Carolina. I’m doing it!”
“And with your help, and possibly the help of some sort of outside group that I am not coordinating with, we can explore taking this country back. Thank you! God bless you all! And God bless Citizens United!”

Citizens United, of course, is the 2010 Supreme Court decision that paved the way for the formation of super PACs, the “independent expenditure-only committees” that can accept donations of unlimited size but are prohibited from directly coordinating with political parties or candidates.

So far, those committees have been responsible for nearly half of all TV ad spending for the 2012 presidential cycle.

With names such as “Make Us Great Again,” “Restore Our Future” and “Priorities USA,” most super PACs give little outward indication as to which candidate’s campaign they’re supporting.

For a test of your super PAC knowledge, take our quiz, and see if you can match up the name of the group to the candidate it supports. (As of press time, the Definitely Not Coordinating With Stephen Colbert Super PAC had yet to be added.)

Read more on PostPolitics.com

Obama proposes shrinking government

Obama’s plans mean musical chairs for the Cabinet

Santorum charity spent most of its money on political friends

Gingrich asks PAC to pull Bain ads


View the original article here