Washingtonpost news updates: February 2012

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Lobbying dips sharply in 2011

Lobbying dips sharply in 2011 - The Washington Post Print SubscriptionConversationsToday's PaperGoing Out GuideJobsCarsReal EstateRentalsClassifiedsHomePoliticsCampaign 2012CongressCourts &LawThe Fed PageHealth CarePollingWhite HouseBlogs & ColumnsIssues: EnergyTop Blogs

Election 2012 | Felicia SonmezThe Fix | Chris CillizzaFederal Eye | Ed O’KeefeFact Checker | Glenn KesslerOpinionsAll OpinionsPostPartisanLeft-LeaningRight-LeaningTolesCartoonsTelnaesAnimationsLocalColumnist IndexLocalDC: Politics| NewsMD: Politics| CommunitiesVA: Politics| CommunitiesCrimeEducationOn Faith/LocalObituariesTraffic & CommutingWeatherBlogs & ColumnsThe Root DCTop Blogs

Post NowThe BuzzCapital Weather GangDr. GridlockSportsRedskins/NFLCapitals/NHLWizards/NBANationals/MLBDC United/SoccerCollegesAllMetSportsOther SportsBlogs & ColumnsTop Blogs

The Insider| Mike JonesCapitals Insider| Katie CarreraWizards Insider | Michael LeeNationals Journal| Adam KilgoreNationalCorrectionsEnergy & EnvironmentHealth & ScienceHigher EducationNational SecurityOn FaithOn LeadershipInnovationsOn GivingBlogs & ColumnsTop Blogs

Ideas@InnovationsPost LeadershipUnder GodCheckpoint WashingtonWorldAfricaTheAmericasAsia &PacificEuropeMiddle EastNational SecurityWar ZonesSpecial ReportsCheckpoint WashingtonBusinessEconomyIndustriesLocal BusinessMarketsPolicy&RegulationTechnologyWorldBusinessBlogs & ColumnsInnovationsOn Small BusinessTop Blogs

Wonkblog | Ezra KleinPost Tech | Cecilia KangFaster ForwardWhere We LiveInvestigationsLifestyleAdviceCarolyn HaxFoodHome & GardenStyleTravelWeddingsWellnessMagazineKidsPostTop Blogs

Arts PostAll We Can EatReliable Source | Roxanne Roberts & Amy ArgetsingerOn Parenting | Janice D’ArcyEntertainmentBooksCelebritiesComicsGoing Out GuideHoroscopesMoviesMuseumsPuzzlesTheater & DanceTVTop Blogs

TV Column | Lisa de MoraesCelebritology | Jen ChaneyClick Track | Chris Richards & David MalitzComic Riffs | Michael CavnaMultimediaInnovationsPhotosVideosThe Washington PostMake us your start page

PersonalizeThe Washington PostCampaign 2012CongressCourts &LawThe Fed PageHealth CarePollingWhite HouseBlogs & ColumnsIssues: EnergyIn the NewsJan Brewer State of the Union Bev Perdue Romney attacks Gingrich tax return ???initialComments:true! pubdate:01/26/2012 12:43 EST! commentPeriod:14! commentEndDate:2/9/12 12:43 EST! currentDate:1/26/12 5:0 EST! allowComments:true! displayComments:true!

What readers think they really said

Solar storm lights up the night sky

Extravagant D.C. homes

Going nuts over squirrels

Lobbying dips sharply in 2011

Text SizePrintE-mailReprints By Dan Eggen,

Lobbying activity plunged in 2011 for the first time in a decade, most likely driven lower by the struggling economy and legislative gridlock on Capitol Hill, according to new estimates released Thursday.

The Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks money in politics, found that trade associations, multinational corporations and other interest groups spent about $3.27 billion on lobbying last year, down from $3.51 billion in 2010.

Comments

Weigh InCorrections?

Gallery

Through the eyes of the American voter:?Washington Post photographers take readers on the campaign trail.

Graphic

Explore the candidates’ campaign finances

Obama outlines incentive plan to reduce college tuition costs

Obama outlines incentive plan to reduce college tuition costs - The Washington Post Print SubscriptionConversationsToday's PaperGoing Out GuideJobsCarsReal EstateRentalsClassifiedsHomePoliticsCampaign 2012CongressCourts &LawThe Fed PageHealth CarePollingWhite HouseBlogs & ColumnsIssues: EnergyTop Blogs

Post NowThe BuzzCapital Weather GangDr. GridlockSportsRedskins/NFLCapitals/NHLWizards/NBANationals/MLBDC United/SoccerCollegesAllMetSportsOther SportsBlogs & ColumnsTop Blogs

Wonkblog | Ezra KleinPost Tech | Cecilia KangFaster ForwardWhere We LiveInvestigationsLifestyleAdviceCarolyn HaxFoodHome & GardenStyleTravelWeddingsWellnessMagazineKidsPostTop Blogs

TV Column | Lisa de MoraesCelebritology | Jen ChaneyClick Track | Chris Richards & David MalitzComic Riffs | Michael CavnaMultimediaInnovationsPhotosVideosThe Washington PostMake us your start page

PersonalizeThe Washington PostCampaign 2012CongressCourts &LawThe Fed PageHealth CarePollingWhite HouseBlogs & ColumnsIssues: EnergyIn the NewsRon Paul Debate winners and losers Jan Brewer Florida poll Aneesh Chopra ???initialComments:true! pubdate:01/27/2012 12:31 EST! commentPeriod:14! commentEndDate:2/10/12 12:31 EST! currentDate:1/27/12 1:0 EST! allowComments:true! displayComments:true!

Photos: GOP candidates at Florida debate

What readers think they really said

Crazy things they confiscate at customs

Extravagant D.C. homes

Obama outlines incentive plan to reduce college tuition costs

Text SizePrintE-mailReprints By David Nakamura and Daniel de Vise,

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — President Obama offered a plan Friday to reduce the costs of higher education by increasing the amount of federal grant money available in low-interest loans and tying it directly to colleges’ ability to reduce tuition.

In an impassioned speech before 4,000 students at the University of Michigan, Obama delivered an election-year pitch to the type of youthful audience that buoyed his 2008 campaign, saying his administration was putting colleges “on notice” that they must rein in soaring prices.

Comments

Weigh InCorrections?

Gallery

?Tuesday’s speech was President Obama’s third State of Union address and his sixth address to Congress overall.

Graphic

Think you know the GOP candidates for presidency? Test your knowledge in this matching game.

More on this Story

Read more on PostPolitics.comWinners and losers of the Florida debateFact checking the CNN debate in FloridaMitt Romney back in the lead in FloridaView all Items in this Story

Ron Paul signed off on racist newsletters, associates sayExhausted and heading toward Florida failure, Santorum heads home--at least for nowRomney boosted in Florida by new poll numbers, strong debate performanceSantorum sought malpractice payout for his wifeObama outlines plan to cut college costsIn Florida, GOP candidates praise Marco Rubio, a favorite for running mateJustice Dept. questions itself in anthrax case

“You can’t assume you’ll just jack up tuition every single year,” Obama said to cheers at Glick Field House, the school’s indoor football facility. “If you can’t stop tuition going up, your funding from taxpayers will go down. We should push colleges to do better; we should hold them accountable if they don’t.”

Obama’s proposal would significantly boost federal investment in the Perkins loan program from $1 billion to $8 billion and revamp the formula for distributing the money. Under the plan, colleges would be rewarded based on their success in offering relatively lower tuition prices, providing value and serving low-income students, the White House said.

The administration also is proposing to provide $1 billion in aid to states that curb higher education costs and to create a competition that provides $55 million in start-up funding for higher education institutions to pursue innovation to boost productivity.

However, most of the plan would require congressional approval, and Republicans have objected to adding expensive new proposals at a time of spiraling national debt. White House officials said the Perkins loan portion of the president’s plan would not cost taxpayers additional dollars because students pay off the aid money with interest.

Obama’s appearance in Ann Arbor was the final stop of a three-day tour of five battleground states that aimed to build public support for the goal laid out in his State of the Union address this week of building an economy that offers more equity and opportunity for the middle class.

That message will frame the president’s reelection argument, and his focus on taming higher education costs echoes one of the central concerns of the Occupy Wall Street protests over the past year. Last fall, Obama announced a strategy to consolidate federal student loans and reduce interest rates to help college graduates pay off their debt.

In his remarks, Obama said access to higher education was a critical tool for young people eager to “do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your own kids to college.”

“That’s what you’re striving for, what the American dream is all about,” he said. “How we keep that issue alive is the defining issue of our time. We do not want to be in a country that looks to success for only a small group of people. We want to be a country where everybody has a chance.”

Higher-education leaders praised the bulk of the president’s proposals. Obama also called on Congress to turn back a proposed doubling of the 3.4 percent interest rate on federal Stafford loans. And he is seeking to create a “College Scorecard” for every institution that is designed to present information about cost, graduation rates and future earnings in an “easy-to-read” format. The federal government has already taken steps in this direction with its College Navigator web site.

Analysts said Obama’s plan probably would not affect the flow of federal Pell grants, the largest source of federal college aid, intended for low-income students.

But there is one potential drawback to the president’s plan: Punishing some colleges by denying them federal aid would affect needy students if those schools are unable to reduce costs.

“Do you take money away from low- and middle-income students and families because you are unhappy with the institution?” said Terry Hartle, senior vice president of the American Council on Education.

Average sticker price at private nonprofit colleges has doubled to $28,500 since the late 1980s, in inflation-adjusted dollars, according to the College Board. But the “net” price of college, after factoring in student aid, is essentially flat over the past five years and has risen at a much slower pace.

Higher-education officials question how the administration would determine whether a college is holding the line on tuition fees.

Colleges might be asked to limit net tuition increases to, say, 3 percent a year to avoid losing aid. But, the educators asked, would the president punish a public college that raised tuition to compensate for lost state subsidies? What if a college with historically low tuition approved a steep increase to avoid operating at a loss?

“That starts to get pretty sticky when you start to think of actual metrics,” said Haley Chitty, spokesman for the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators.

De Vise reported from Washington.

EmailTumblrRedditStumbleuponDiggDeliciousWeigh InDiscussion PolicyAbout Discussions, Badges Newest firstOldest firstMost Recommended first SuperFan Badge

SuperFan badge holders consistently post smart, timely comments about Washington area sports and teams.