Washingtonpost news updates: Judge Rakoff on free love, the death penalty, defending crooks and Wall Street justice

Friday, January 27, 2012

Judge Rakoff on free love, the death penalty, defending crooks and Wall Street justice

Judge Rakoff on free love, the death penalty, defending crooks and Wall Street justice - The Washington Post Print SubscriptionConversationsToday's PaperGoing Out GuideJobsCarsReal EstateRentalsClassifiedsHomePoliticsCampaign 2012CongressCourts &LawThe Fed PageHealth CarePollingWhite HouseBlogs & ColumnsIssues: EnergyTop Blogs

Election 2012 | Felicia SonmezThe Fix | Chris CillizzaFederal Eye | Ed O’KeefeFact Checker | Glenn KesslerOpinionsAll OpinionsPostPartisanLeft-LeaningRight-LeaningTolesCartoonsTelnaesAnimationsLocalColumnist IndexLocalDC: Politics| NewsMD: Politics| CommunitiesVA: Politics| CommunitiesCrimeEducationOn Faith/LocalObituariesTraffic & CommutingWeatherBlogs & ColumnsThe Root DCTop Blogs

Post NowThe BuzzCapital Weather GangDr. GridlockSportsRedskins/NFLCapitals/NHLWizards/NBANationals/MLBDC United/SoccerCollegesAllMetSportsOther SportsBlogs & ColumnsTop Blogs

The Insider| Mike JonesCapitals Insider| Katie CarreraWizards Insider | Michael LeeNationals Journal| Adam KilgoreNationalCorrectionsEnergy & EnvironmentHealth & ScienceHigher EducationNational SecurityOn FaithOn LeadershipInnovationsOn GivingBlogs & ColumnsTop Blogs

Ideas@InnovationsPost LeadershipUnder GodCheckpoint WashingtonWorldAfricaTheAmericasAsia &PacificEuropeMiddle EastNational SecurityWar ZonesSpecial ReportsCheckpoint WashingtonBusinessEconomyIndustriesLocal BusinessMarketsPolicy&RegulationTechnologyWorldBusinessBlogs & ColumnsInnovationsOn Small BusinessTop Blogs

Wonkblog | Ezra KleinPost Tech | Cecilia KangFaster ForwardPolitical EconomyInvestigationsLifestyleAdviceCarolyn HaxFoodHome & GardenStyleTravelWeddingsWellnessMagazineKidsPostTop Blogs

Arts PostAll We Can EatReliable Source | Roxanne Roberts & Amy ArgetsingerOn Parenting | Janice D’ArcyEntertainmentBooksCelebritiesComicsGoing Out GuideHoroscopesMoviesMuseumsPuzzlesTheater & DanceTVTop Blogs

TV Column | Lisa de MoraesCelebritology | Jen ChaneyClick Track | Chris Richards & David MalitzComic Riffs | Michael CavnaMultimediaInnovationsPhotosVideosThe Washington PostBloombergThe Washington PostEconomyIndustriesLocal BusinessMarketsPolicy&RegulationTechnologyWorldBusinessBlogs & ColumnsInnovationsOn Small BusinessIn the NewsSOPA PIPA Megaupload Wikipedia Anonymous ???initialComments:true! pubdate:01/20/2012 12:10 EST! commentPeriod:14! commentEndDate:2/3/12 12:10 EST! currentDate:1/20/12 12:0 EST! allowComments:true! displayComments:true!

Photos: Sarah Burke’s life on the hill

Newt’s ex-wife: He wanted ‘open marriage’

Photos: 50 most powerful in Washington

Photos: Wrecked cruise ship remains on Italian...

Judge Rakoff on free love, the death penalty, defending crooks and Wall Street justice

(James Patrick Cooper/ ) - U.S. District Judge JEd Rakoff, who recently rejected a proposed $33 Million settlement that would have resolved th U.S. Securities and Exchange commission's clai that Bank of America Corp. deceived investor about bonuses to be paid to Merrill Lynch executives.

(James Patrick Cooper/ ) - U.S. District Judge ed Rakoff, who recently rejected a proposed $33 Million settlement that would have resolved th U.S. Securities and Exchange commission's clai that Bank of America Corp. deceived investor about bonuses to be paid to Merrill Lynch executives.

CAPTIONFULLSCREEN

Text SizePrintE-mailReprints By David S. Hilzenrath,

From a courtroom in Manhattan, not far from the epicenter of the nation’s financial crisis, a longtime federal judge is becoming a hero to many and a nightmare to some for demanding greater accountability in cases of alleged Wall Street fraud.

Jed S. Rakoff is driving regulators nuts by refusing to rubber-stamp the kind of deals that have long defined Securities and Exchange Commission justice — boilerplate settlements in which companies use shareholders’ money to pay fines while they neither admit nor deny doing anything wrong. The latest example called for Citigroup to pay $285 million for alleged misconduct during the mortgage meltdown.

Comments

Weigh InCorrections?

Gallery

?Meet the regulators of the nation's financial institutions.

Gallery

?Insider trading hall of shame: Here’s a look at some of the major insider-trading cases over the years.

The potential impact of Rakoff’s stand goes beyond the financial arena to other industries and regulators that rely on negotiated settlements.

“This is Jed Rakoff against the world,” said Joel Seligman, a scholar of securities law.

The dispute seemed to take on a more personal edge over the holidays, when Rakoff accused the SEC of blindsiding him during legal maneuvers. And the battle lines became sharper this month when the Business Roundtable, a major corporate lobby, weighed in on the side of the SEC in its quest to see Rakoff’s ruling in the Citigroup case overturned.

The judge’s fans — and how many judges have fans? — see him as the rare authority trying to impose Wall Street penalties that fit the offense. Rakoff for president, some say.

Critics — some with a stake in business as usual — see him as a headline-chaser who could end up undermining his own agenda by forcing the SEC to actually win its cases.

“Novel” and “potentially dangerous,” the Business Roundtable said of his position.

Largely lost in the din are deeper truths about the man who, for better or worse, could singlehandedly force a revolution in the way the government polices Corporate America.

First, far from being an outsider to the world of white-collar enforcement, Rakoff, 68, is part of an old boys’ (and girls’) network that dominates Wall Street justice.

Earlier in his career, as a Justice Department prosecutor and then a white-collar defense lawyer, Rakoff worked closely with the SEC. Decades ago, he was even interviewed by an SEC chairman for the job of SEC enforcement director. Someone else got the job. Rakoff said he had not applied for the position and pursued it with only half-hearted interest, partly because of the financial trade-off it would entail.

Second, Rakoff isn’t just calling for Wall Street to be held accountable. He’s also insisting that the government be held accountable when it uses its power to make accusations and exact penalties. Law enforcement, he argues, should be more than a government shakedown.

“An application of judicial power that does not rest on facts is worse than mindless, it is inherently dangerous,” he wrote. “If its deployment does not rest on facts — cold, hard, solid facts, established either by admissions or by trials — it serves no lawful or moral purpose and is simply an engine of oppression.”

The SEC complains that Rakoff would require it to spend more time and money on trials, thereby reducing the number of cases it can pursue. But there’s another dimension. By insisting on proof — not just by tying up resources — Rakoff could well deter regulators from taking some enforcement actions.

Continued12345Next Page

EmailTumblrRedditStumbleuponDiggDeliciousWeigh InDiscussion PolicyAbout Discussions, Badges Newest firstOldest firstMost Recommended first SuperFan Badge

SuperFan badge holders consistently post smart, timely comments about Washington area sports and teams.